Now that I have been tinkering with Knockout for about a year, I have finally settled on a host of design patterns that I feel strike a nice balance between rigid consistency and flexible prototyping. I like to have all of my code look very similar. I can look at most code that I have written and know about when I worked on it last. I can usually even look at code that several other developers have touched and see what is mine and what is everyone else's code. Now that I have a team to direct and an expanding code base to maintain, I have realized that I need to document my own code patterns.
<a href="https://youtu.be/lZKiYgcgBAY" title="It&#x27;s good to be the king&#x27;"><img src="/images/good-to-be-king.jpg" alt="&#x22;It&#x27;s good to be the king&#x22;"></a>
Certainly, my way probably is not the absolute best, but it is what I like and what has worked best for me. Might I change my mind? Absolutely. Probably even before I finish writing this post, I will have changed my mind on several points. However, this is a good place to start.
<hr>
Two days later, as I started to write up the actual rules I had been following, I decided to look around and see if other people have put together lists of their own. It brought me to this <a href="http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/1323/does-your-company-have-a-coding-standard">"Programmers (Stack Exchange)"</a> question, which had a very nice explanation on why what I was doing was a bad idea.
<blockquote>
It is important for a team to have a single coding standard for each language to avoid several problems:
<ul>
<li>A lack of standards can make your code unreadable.</li>
<li>Disagreement over standards can cause check-in wars between developers.</li>
<li>Seeing different standards in the same class can be extremely irritating.</li>
</ul>
I'm a big fan of what <a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?UncleBobOnCodingStandards">Uncle Bob has to say</a> about standards:
<ol>
<li>Let them evolve during the first few iterations.</li>
<li>Let them be team specific instead of company specific.</li>
<li>Don't write them down if you can avoid it. Rather, let the code be the way the standards are captured.</li>
<li>Don't legislate good design. (e.g. don't tell people not to use goto)</li>
<li>Make sure everyone knows that the standard is about communication, and nothing else.</li>
<li>After the first few iterations, get the team together to decide.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
So much for that idea.
What have I learned? Well, I have learned that I like this idea of doing two weeks of off-the-cuff posts, and then spending one week putting together a longer post with lots of research and information in it. I also learned that I should do the research for that post at the beginning of the week, instead of at the end of the week. I think I will be coming back to this idea, but it will be less formal that the list of edicts I started putting together. Perhaps a screen-shot of source code with annotations will be the good balance between formality and flexibility.

Establishing KnockoutJs Design Patterns

Somewhere between the freshly fallen, pristine snow of winter and the new growth and warmth of spring lies the ugliest week in Chicago. This week that exposes the filth of the city.
During these first several days with multiple above-freezing periods, including a spike into the fifties, the streets of this town become an ugly slurry of disgusting waste. All of the dirt, garbage, and feces that got buried with each new snow are now exposed. The thick ice under all the snow is now a deep black covered in litter. Large opaque pools form in the deep potholes created by the winter's fluctuating temperatures. Sidewalks are flooded with this same sludge because it has nowhere to go. The clocks were recently adjusted because of the abomination that is Daylight Savings Time, so everyone is a little grumpy this week. The weather hints at the coming warmth of Spring, but forces us to still keep bundled up, just in case another snow storm comes rolling through.
There is little good to say about this week.

The Ugliest Week in Chicago

Take a drink every time someone says "free" or "freedom", and you will be drunk before the battles even begin.
I would be surprised if you could survive the movie.
I enjoyed the movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416449/">300</a>, both the interpretation of history and the art direction. I had to turn
off my brain for some of the parts that adjusted history, but overall it was a lot of fun. If 300 was not appealing, then there is nothing
to enjoy in Rise of an Empire. For those that enjoyed the original, there is a lot to enjoy in the follow-up movie. Personally, while I
found the film a little long in exposition, it still met my expectations and was almost exactly what I wanted out of my cinematic experience.
Some things that I really enjoyed:
<ul>
<li>The art direction was absolutely gorgeous, and stung together an non-stop litany of stunning visuals. Combined with phenomenal editing, sound editing, and sound effects, and the movie is a treat on the senses.</li>
<li>Men and (two) women with excellent physiques constantly performing stunts, drawing copious amounts of digital blood, and seething with all the primal rage of battle leads to some epic battles.</li>
<li>Speaking of battles, the naval combat was as epic and glorious as the tight confined combat of the first movie.</li>
<li>Interesting interpretations of history. "Interesting" - that is a safe word.</li>
<li>Eva Green absolutely stole the show as Artemisia. This is one of the instance where the costuming team just did not give a damn about keeping it period accurate, and the movie was better for it.</li>
</ul>
Parts of the movie that I did not enjoy:
<ul>
<li>The exposition draws on forever in their constant, repetitive harping of the theme of freedom. The audience gets it, Themistocles wants to unite the Greeks, and he cannot do it without the Spartans. Also, a free Greece is better than a Persian Greece. Also, free men want to be free. It was the 'MerkaFuckYeah of 480 B.C.E.; if this does not play well to the Freedom Loving Free People for Freeing Freedom, I am not entirely sure what will.</li>
<li>The sex scene was gratuitous, but really damn hot.</li>
<li>Sullivan Stapleton is no Gerard Butler.</li>
<li>Lena Headey was not given a chance to be as wonderful in this movie as she was in 300.</li>
<li>The exposition ate up far too much screen time. I blame the writers for this, and possibly the director for not cutting more of it out of the movie. If they were trying to hit some magical amount of screen time, exposition could have easily been cut out and the naval battles could have been extended.</li>
</ul>
One final point that grates my nerves when movies do it, and this movie did it at least twice. In fact, it annoys me when televisions shows do it, too. Do not, ever, under any circumstances, repeat a scene from a previous part of the movie or television show. It is lazy editing and insulting to the audience to repeat the exact same scene, just copying and pasting the film from one point to another. If the director or story teller wants to have something repeated, at least do something new for the audience. Trying showing the scene from a different camera angle, or adjust it based on a different character's perspective. Just do not assume that I am so forgetful that sixty minutes later, I have completely forgotten about that critical scene that you already emphasized was very critical.
On a four star scale, I rate this movie Freedom and Meets Expectations.

300: Rise Of an Empire Of Freedom For Free Greeks

I am a tall, healthy, heterosexual, white, male, middle-class American. I will earn more money over the course of my career than my female colleagues and my racially minority peers. I will have easier access to credit lines, continuing education, travel prerequisites, political office, housing opportunities, career advancement, and basically anything else that I may want. I am less likely to be arrested on suspicion of a crime, and if I have to wade through the judicial system, I am less likely to be convicted of a crime. Statistically, it is pretty fantastic being me. The game is rigged in my favor, and I have no complaints about it.
Try telling that to a high school student just learning to discover the way of the world.
For years, I was bitter and upset - genuinely angry - at minorities. I could name a litany of very active, outspoken, well-funded groups and organizations dedicated to supporting everyone but me. Finding an organization that supports blacks or women or homosexuals or poor or fat or short people was easy. There were clubs at the school to support many of the ethnically, economically, or gender disadvantaged students. When applying for college, there were scholarships for every category of person except me. It was very easy for me to feel angry and unsupported.
Once I got to college, it all sorted out, and I was able to put together all of the aforementioned advantages of my situation. It took some serious work to stop being angry, to no longer feel disadvantaged, to embrace the privilege, to support equality. I am very much past that part of my life, and am a better person for it. It was certainly a difficult journey and I still have some of the scars from the internal reshaping I had to endure. However, this is not a post looking for pity, this is a look forward.
I have found that this is a lesson that I need to teach my son as soon as he gets to a point where he might understand these things. He too is a white, tall, male, middle-class American - too soon to know if he will share the healthy and hetero traits, but statistics say he probably will. Before he can come to the same initial conclusions that I did, I will need to direct him to the reality of his situation, and ensure that he does not have a false perception of social inequality of support.
It is easy being me, but it is incredibly hard. Society supports me without forming organizations explicitly to support me; life is easy like that. In particular, it is extremely easy to just accept the status quo and carry on with life. However, it is also my responsibility to help anyone else that is not being supported by society; that is the hard part. As a member of the majority my moral role is to make it so that minorities do not need specialized support systems. Imagine the amount of money that could be saved if women and minorities no longer needed to advocate for equal treatment or considerations; or the amount of time these smart, dedicated personnel would be able to dedicate to other causes. This… this is the hard part.
I cannot do much, but what I can do is affect one person at a time; and I will be starting with my own child.

No Support For White Men

I work almost exclusively on the Microsoft WISC stack. The first response that I hear from almost every single developer that I've chatted with is something along the lines of "oh, that's all closed source software". It makes me want to throttle them. Mostly because it is an entirely antiquated line of thinking that just shows a lack of actual knowledge of the ecosystem.
Here is a list of the different libraries used in my current project:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/">ASP.NET MVC</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/DotNetOpenAuth/DotNetOpenAuth">DotNetOpenAuth</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/SamSaffron/MiniProfiler">MiniProfiler</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mvccontrib.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest">MvcContrib</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/JamesNK/Newtonsoft.Json">Newtonsoft.Json</a></li>
<li><a href="http://unity.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest">Unit Application Block</a></li>
<li><a href="http://unity.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest">WebActivator</a></li>
<li><a href="http://commonservicelocator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest">CommonServiceLocator</a></li>
</ul>
The list of JavaScript libraries is long, but the major packages that are used are:
<ul>
<li>Knockoutjs</li>
<li>jQuery</li>
<li>jQueryUI</li>
<li>Moment.js</li>
<li>Globalize.js</li>
</ul>
The tools that I use are a mix of paid closed source, freemium closed source, and FOSS:
<ul>
<li>Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 (paid closed source) - though the 14 different extensions that I use with VS are all free and open source.</li>
<li>LinqPad (freemium closed source) - well worth every penny</li>
<li>Visual Studio Online (freemium closed source service) - also known as Team Foundation Service</li>
</ul>
The core Microsoft part of the stack is paid, closed source - sure. They have to make their money somehow. However, just because the base part of the stack is closed source does not mean that every developer is producing closed source code. There is lots of open source software written for the WISC stack, and plenty more will be written. Both by Microsoft, and by other developers.
Elitism at its finest… and people wonder why sometimes I hate socializing with developers.

Just Because It's On the Microsoft Stack Doesn't Mean It's Closed Source

<blockquote>
Content is King
-Bill Gates
</blockquote>
How to people with a full-time job, active social lives, a wife and kid, desire to slaughter digital demons, interest in pop culture, and unhealthy need to stay on top of the news? have any time left over to hack together these wonderfully articulate, annotated, categorized, and sublimely written daily blog posts? I just do not understand it!
At this point, I have seven posts in my draft folder. All of which can easily be expanded out to two or three posts. All of which could add a great deal of content to the cloud of collective knowledge.
As I write this, I am doing a manual restore of a database to the reporting server because our DBA is out and the normal task to restore the database is not functioning. I am also providing data to high level managers that I am only mostly sure is correct (because the person who is really knows the data is the aforementioned DBA). I am also trying to navigate an odd bug that selectively happens when I try to switch binding contexts in a Knockout view while using jQueryUi widgets. I am also putting together plans for a vacation in April. I am also writing two other blog posts in other windows as ideas keep coming in.
Seriously - how to people focus on just one topic, and write on that topic from beginning to end? I just don't get it.
But here is something, and I have finished today's blog post.

Que Sera, Sera: The Value of Content

I started this post with an idea. I got as far as the title, then somewhere between that text box and the text area below it, I completely lost what I was going to write. I just stared at my fingers sitting diligently on the keyboard, waiting for me to give them commands.
These thoughts are mine, but what about when I cannot summon the thoughts. I thought I had several easy-to-hammer-out blog posts ready to go. I thought I would at least last for a few days before I completely blocked myself from being able to type. Apparently, twenty-four hours is enough.
Today is supposed to be a <a href="http://marketing.linkedin.com/blog/the-blogging-food-groups-a-well-balanced-diet-of-content-infographic/">Meats</a> day for writing. I am not entirely sure what that is supposed to mean, but I think I have plenty of ideas for what to put together. So today's meat post is going to be about what future meat posts I am going to write. These include:
<ul>
<li>Cross posts with my Laivani project, wherein I learn about donor management systems and modern WISC coding patterns as I go along.</li>
<li>A more comprehensive documentation of Knockout's utility functions.</li>
<li>Other posts about important things.</li>
</ul>
This experiment is going to be a disaster; I can tell already.

Rovani's Sandbox

Blog Posts - Page 14